Unofficial Results Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Results Home

Precincts Reporting in State: 100% 30 of 30

Last Updated: 12/07/12 11:46 AM

Voters Registered at 7AM: 5,536

Results for Constitutional Amendments

Passage of a Constitutional Amendment depends on the total number of voters casting ballots in the election. On this site, the total number voting is estimated using the votes cast for U.S. President, and is replaced by the actual number who voted as voting statistics are entered for each precinct.

Value	Definition
Estimated Total Number of Voters	Calculated using votes for U.S. President & Vice President or actual statistics.
Yes	Actual YES votes cast
No	Actual NO votes cast
Estimated Blanks	Equals Estimated Total Number of Voters minus Yes votes and No votes
Estimated Percent of YES*	YES divided by Estimated Total Number of Voters, displayed as a percentage
*An estimated YES percentage of greater than 50% is an indication of likely passage of an amendment.

Results by Precinct for Swift County
Constitutional Amendment 2 Show Question
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT 2 PHOTO IDENTIFICATION REQUIRED FOR VOTING
Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to require all voters to present valid photo identification to vote and to require the state to provide free identification to eligible voters, effective July 1, 2013?
APPLETON
Yes	228
No	444
Estimated Blanks	0
Estimated Total Number of Voters	672
Estimated Percent of YES*	33.93%

APPLETON TWP.
Yes	76
No	46
Estimated Blanks	1
Estimated Total Number of Voters	123
Estimated Percent of YES*	61.79%

BENSON P-1
Yes	312
No	519
Estimated Blanks	87
Estimated Total Number of Voters	918
Estimated Percent of YES*	33.99%

BENSON P-2
Yes	294
No	514
Estimated Blanks	67
Estimated Total Number of Voters	875
Estimated Percent of YES*	33.60%

BENSON TWP.
Yes	68
No	123
Estimated Blanks	20
Estimated Total Number of Voters	211
Estimated Percent of YES*	32.23%

CAMP LAKE TWP.
Yes	35
No	81
Estimated Blanks	0
Estimated Total Number of Voters	116
Estimated Percent of YES*	30.17%

CASHEL TWP.
Yes	37
No	42
Estimated Blanks	2
Estimated Total Number of Voters	81
Estimated Percent of YES*	45.68%

CLONTARF
Yes	42
No	43
Estimated Blanks	0
Estimated Total Number of Voters	85
Estimated Percent of YES*	49.41%

CLONTARF TWP.
Yes	15
No	27
Estimated Blanks	0
Estimated Total Number of Voters	42
Estimated Percent of YES*	35.71%

DANVERS
Yes	27
No	23
Estimated Blanks	0
Estimated Total Number of Voters	50
Estimated Percent of YES*	54.00%

DEGRAFF
Yes	23
No	55
Estimated Blanks	3
Estimated Total Number of Voters	81
Estimated Percent of YES*	28.40%

DUBLIN TWP.
Yes	47
No	39
Estimated Blanks	8
Estimated Total Number of Voters	94
Estimated Percent of YES*	50.00%

EDISON TWP.
Yes	26
No	34
Estimated Blanks	0
Estimated Total Number of Voters	60
Estimated Percent of YES*	43.33%

FAIRFIELD TWP.
Yes	41
No	32
Estimated Blanks	0
Estimated Total Number of Voters	73
Estimated Percent of YES*	56.16%

HAYES TWP.
Yes	44
No	65
Estimated Blanks	1
Estimated Total Number of Voters	110
Estimated Percent of YES*	40.00%

HEGBERT TWP.
Yes	23
No	39
Estimated Blanks	0
Estimated Total Number of Voters	62
Estimated Percent of YES*	37.10%

HOLLOWAY
Yes	28
No	27
Estimated Blanks	0
Estimated Total Number of Voters	55
Estimated Percent of YES*	50.91%

KERKHOVEN
Yes	197
No	230
Estimated Blanks	27
Estimated Total Number of Voters	454
Estimated Percent of YES*	43.39%

KERKHOVEN TWP.
Yes	69
No	77
Estimated Blanks	1
Estimated Total Number of Voters	147
Estimated Percent of YES*	46.94%

KILDARE TWP.
Yes	28
No	48
Estimated Blanks	7
Estimated Total Number of Voters	83
Estimated Percent of YES*	33.73%

MARYSLAND TWP.
Yes	16
No	23
Estimated Blanks	0
Estimated Total Number of Voters	39
Estimated Percent of YES*	41.03%

MOYER TWP.
Yes	19
No	33
Estimated Blanks	0
Estimated Total Number of Voters	52
Estimated Percent of YES*	36.54%

MURDOCK
Yes	53
No	74
Estimated Blanks	9
Estimated Total Number of Voters	136
Estimated Percent of YES*	38.97%

PILLSBURY TWP.
Yes	78
No	80
Estimated Blanks	6
Estimated Total Number of Voters	164
Estimated Percent of YES*	47.56%

SHIBLE TWP.
Yes	34
No	40
Estimated Blanks	0
Estimated Total Number of Voters	74
Estimated Percent of YES*	45.95%

SIX MILE GROVE TWP.
Yes	37
No	50
Estimated Blanks	0
Estimated Total Number of Voters	87
Estimated Percent of YES*	42.53%

SWENODA TWP.
Yes	37
No	40
Estimated Blanks	0
Estimated Total Number of Voters	77
Estimated Percent of YES*	48.05%

TARA TWP.
Yes	18
No	36
Estimated Blanks	0
Estimated Total Number of Voters	54
Estimated Percent of YES*	33.33%

TORNING TWP.
Yes	91
No	134
Estimated Blanks	17
Estimated Total Number of Voters	242
Estimated Percent of YES*	37.60%

WEST BANK TWP.
Yes	30
No	57
Estimated Blanks	3
Estimated Total Number of Voters	90
Estimated Percent of YES*	33.33%

Results State Results by Congressional District Results by Legislative District Results by County

Results for Constitutional Amendments

Results by Precinct for Swift County