Unofficial Results Tuesday, November 6, 2012
Precincts Reporting in State: 100% 33 of 33
Last Updated: 12/07/12 11:46 AM
Voters Registered at 7AM: 13,718
Results for Constitutional Amendments
Passage of a Constitutional Amendment depends on the total number of voters casting ballots in the election. On this site, the total number voting is estimated using the votes cast for U.S. President, and is replaced by the actual number who voted as voting statistics are entered for each precinct.| Value | Definition |
|---|---|
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | Calculated using votes for U.S. President & Vice President or actual statistics. |
| Yes | Actual YES votes cast |
| No | Actual NO votes cast |
| Estimated Blanks | Equals Estimated Total Number of Voters minus Yes votes and No votes |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | YES divided by Estimated Total Number of Voters, displayed as a percentage |
| *An estimated YES percentage of greater than 50% is an indication of likely passage of an amendment. | |
Results by Precinct for Lyon County |
|
| Constitutional Amendment 2 Show Question | |
| CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT 2 PHOTO IDENTIFICATION REQUIRED FOR VOTING | |
| AMIRET TWP | |
| Yes | 66 |
| No | 65 |
| Estimated Blanks | 2 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 133 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 49.62% |
| BALATON | |
| Yes | 154 |
| No | 158 |
| Estimated Blanks | 7 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 319 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 48.28% |
| CLIFTON TWP | |
| Yes | 55 |
| No | 72 |
| Estimated Blanks | 2 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 129 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 42.64% |
| COON CREEK TWP | |
| Yes | 68 |
| No | 76 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 144 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 47.22% |
| COTTONWOOD | |
| Yes | 267 |
| No | 341 |
| Estimated Blanks | 5 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 613 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 43.56% |
| CUSTER TWP | |
| Yes | 58 |
| No | 53 |
| Estimated Blanks | 1 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 112 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 51.79% |
| EIDSVOLD TWP | |
| Yes | 41 |
| No | 63 |
| Estimated Blanks | 2 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 106 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 38.68% |
| FAIRVIEW TWP | |
| Yes | 118 |
| No | 87 |
| Estimated Blanks | 6 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 211 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 55.92% |
| FLORENCE | |
| Yes | 8 |
| No | 7 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 15 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 53.33% |
| GARVIN | |
| Yes | 29 |
| No | 31 |
| Estimated Blanks | 1 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 61 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 47.54% |
| GHENT | |
| Yes | 83 |
| No | 97 |
| Estimated Blanks | 2 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 182 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 45.60% |
| GRANDVIEW TWP | |
| Yes | 95 |
| No | 65 |
| Estimated Blanks | 1 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 161 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 59.01% |
| ISLAND LAKE TWP | |
| Yes | 55 |
| No | 53 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 108 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 50.93% |
| LAKE MARSHALL TWP | |
| Yes | 185 |
| No | 136 |
| Estimated Blanks | 1 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 322 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 57.45% |
| LUCAS TWP | |
| Yes | 59 |
| No | 49 |
| Estimated Blanks | 2 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 110 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 53.64% |
| LYND | |
| Yes | 107 |
| No | 95 |
| Estimated Blanks | 2 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 204 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 52.45% |
| LYND TWP | |
| Yes | 127 |
| No | 117 |
| Estimated Blanks | 3 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 247 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 51.42% |
| LYONS TWP | |
| Yes | 60 |
| No | 60 |
| Estimated Blanks | 1 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 121 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 49.59% |
| MARSHALL W-1 | |
| Yes | 1,005 |
| No | 1,088 |
| Estimated Blanks | 36 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 2,129 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 47.21% |
| MARSHALL W-2 | |
| Yes | 1,097 |
| No | 1,097 |
| Estimated Blanks | 23 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 2,217 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 49.48% |
| MARSHALL W-3 | |
| Yes | 970 |
| No | 980 |
| Estimated Blanks | 14 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 1,964 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 49.39% |
| MINNEOTA | |
| Yes | 318 |
| No | 342 |
| Estimated Blanks | 9 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 669 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 47.53% |
| MONROE TWP | |
| Yes | 49 |
| No | 66 |
| Estimated Blanks | 1 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 116 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 42.24% |
| NORDLAND TWP | |
| Yes | 53 |
| No | 58 |
| Estimated Blanks | 2 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 113 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 46.90% |
| ROCK LAKE TWP | |
| Yes | 78 |
| No | 78 |
| Estimated Blanks | 5 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 161 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 48.45% |
| RUSSELL | |
| Yes | 58 |
| No | 88 |
| Estimated Blanks | 2 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 148 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 39.19% |
| SHELBURNE TWP | |
| Yes | 39 |
| No | 48 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 87 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 44.83% |
| SODUS TWP | |
| Yes | 95 |
| No | 70 |
| Estimated Blanks | 7 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 172 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 55.23% |
| STANLEY TWP | |
| Yes | 79 |
| No | 60 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 139 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 56.83% |
| TAUNTON | |
| Yes | 19 |
| No | 41 |
| Estimated Blanks | 3 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 63 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 30.16% |
| TRACY | |
| Yes | 434 |
| No | 484 |
| Estimated Blanks | 9 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 927 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 46.82% |
| VALLERS TWP | |
| Yes | 64 |
| No | 50 |
| Estimated Blanks | 1 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 115 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 55.65% |
| WESTERHEIM TWP | |
| Yes | 65 |
| No | 76 |
| Estimated Blanks | 2 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 143 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 45.45% |