Unofficial Results Tuesday, November 6, 2012
Precincts Reporting in State: 100% 30 of 30
Last Updated: 12/07/12 11:46 AM
Voters Registered at 7AM: 5,872
Results for Constitutional Amendments
Passage of a Constitutional Amendment depends on the total number of voters casting ballots in the election. On this site, the total number voting is estimated using the votes cast for U.S. President, and is replaced by the actual number who voted as voting statistics are entered for each precinct.| Value | Definition |
|---|---|
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | Calculated using votes for U.S. President & Vice President or actual statistics. |
| Yes | Actual YES votes cast |
| No | Actual NO votes cast |
| Estimated Blanks | Equals Estimated Total Number of Voters minus Yes votes and No votes |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | YES divided by Estimated Total Number of Voters, displayed as a percentage |
| *An estimated YES percentage of greater than 50% is an indication of likely passage of an amendment. | |
Results by Precinct for Yellow Medicine County |
|
| Constitutional Amendment 1 Show Question | |
| CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT 1 RECOGNITION OF MARRIAGE SOLELY BETWEEN ONE MAN AND ONE WOMAN | |
| BURTON TWP | |
| Yes | 70 |
| No | 24 |
| Estimated Blanks | 2 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 96 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 72.92% |
| CANBY | |
| Yes | 506 |
| No | 327 |
| Estimated Blanks | 8 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 841 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 60.17% |
| CLARKFIELD | |
| Yes | 277 |
| No | 142 |
| Estimated Blanks | 2 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 421 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 65.80% |
| ECHO | |
| Yes | 93 |
| No | 42 |
| Estimated Blanks | 2 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 137 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 67.88% |
| ECHO TWP | |
| Yes | 78 |
| No | 15 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 93 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 83.87% |
| FLORIDA TWP | |
| Yes | 41 |
| No | 19 |
| Estimated Blanks | 1 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 61 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 67.21% |
| FORTIER TWP | |
| Yes | 47 |
| No | 14 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 61 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 77.05% |
| FRIENDSHIP TWP | |
| Yes | 92 |
| No | 42 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 134 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 68.66% |
| GRANITE FALLS W-1 | |
| Yes | 555 |
| No | 453 |
| Estimated Blanks | 13 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 1,021 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 54.36% |
| HAMMER TWP | |
| Yes | 86 |
| No | 31 |
| Estimated Blanks | 3 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 120 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 71.67% |
| HANLEY FALLS | |
| Yes | 82 |
| No | 25 |
| Estimated Blanks | 1 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 108 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 75.93% |
| HAZEL RUN | |
| Yes | 17 |
| No | 14 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 31 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 54.84% |
| HAZEL RUN TWP | |
| Yes | 79 |
| No | 41 |
| Estimated Blanks | 1 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 121 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 65.29% |
| LISBON TWP | |
| Yes | 63 |
| No | 41 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 104 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 60.58% |
| MINNESOTA FALLS TWP | |
| Yes | 132 |
| No | 91 |
| Estimated Blanks | 4 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 227 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 58.15% |
| NORMAN TWP | |
| Yes | 130 |
| No | 38 |
| Estimated Blanks | 1 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 169 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 76.92% |
| NORMANIA TWP | |
| Yes | 76 |
| No | 24 |
| Estimated Blanks | 2 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 102 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 74.51% |
| OMRO TWP | |
| Yes | 52 |
| No | 10 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 62 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 83.87% |
| OSHKOSH TWP | |
| Yes | 97 |
| No | 28 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 125 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 77.60% |
| PORTER | |
| Yes | 66 |
| No | 28 |
| Estimated Blanks | 2 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 96 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 68.75% |
| POSEN TWP | |
| Yes | 99 |
| No | 28 |
| Estimated Blanks | 1 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 128 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 77.34% |
| SANDNES TWP | |
| Yes | 65 |
| No | 49 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 114 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 57.02% |
| SIOUX AGENCY TWP | |
| Yes | 109 |
| No | 31 |
| Estimated Blanks | 1 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 141 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 77.30% |
| ST LEO | |
| Yes | 40 |
| No | 16 |
| Estimated Blanks | 1 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 57 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 70.18% |
| STONY RUN TWP | |
| Yes | 176 |
| No | 99 |
| Estimated Blanks | 1 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 276 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 63.77% |
| SWEDE PRAIRIE TWP | |
| Yes | 57 |
| No | 18 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 75 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 76.00% |
| TYRO TWP | |
| Yes | 80 |
| No | 21 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 101 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 79.21% |
| WERGELAND TWP | |
| Yes | 68 |
| No | 37 |
| Estimated Blanks | 2 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 107 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 63.55% |
| WOOD LAKE | |
| Yes | 144 |
| No | 55 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 199 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 72.36% |
| WOOD LAKE TWP | |
| Yes | 95 |
| No | 32 |
| Estimated Blanks | 1 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 128 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 74.22% |