Skip to main content
Important Changes to Office Operations: COVID-19 Information
Unofficial Results Tuesday, November 6, 2012
Precincts Reporting in State: 100%  22 of 22
Last Updated:  11/08/12 9:58 AM
Voters Registered at 7AM: 5,071

Results for Constitutional Amendments

Passage of a Constitutional Amendment depends on the total number of voters casting ballots in the election. On this site, the total number voting is estimated using the votes cast for U.S. President, and is replaced by the actual number who voted as voting statistics are entered for each precinct.
Value Definition
Estimated Total Number of Voters Calculated using votes for U.S. President & Vice President or actual statistics.
Yes Actual YES votes cast
No Actual NO votes cast
Estimated Blanks Equals Estimated Total Number of Voters minus Yes votes and No votes
Estimated Percent of YES* YES divided by Estimated Total Number of Voters, displayed as a percentage
*An estimated YES percentage of greater than 50% is an indication of likely passage of an amendment.

 

Results by Precinct for Pipestone County

Constitutional Amendment 1   Show Question
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT 1 RECOGNITION OF MARRIAGE SOLELY BETWEEN ONE MAN AND ONE WOMAN
AETNA TWP.
Yes 96
No 24
Estimated Blanks 0
Estimated Total Number of Voters 120
Estimated Percent of YES* 80.00%

ALTONA TWP.
Yes 54
No 18
Estimated Blanks 0
Estimated Total Number of Voters 72
Estimated Percent of YES* 75.00%

BURKE TWP.
Yes 109
No 11
Estimated Blanks 1
Estimated Total Number of Voters 121
Estimated Percent of YES* 90.08%

EDEN TWP.
Yes 114
No 29
Estimated Blanks 2
Estimated Total Number of Voters 145
Estimated Percent of YES* 78.62%

EDGERTON
Yes 622
No 80
Estimated Blanks 8
Estimated Total Number of Voters 710
Estimated Percent of YES* 87.61%

ELMER TWP.
Yes 106
No 16
Estimated Blanks 2
Estimated Total Number of Voters 124
Estimated Percent of YES* 85.48%

FOUNTAIN PRAIRIE
Yes 81
No 14
Estimated Blanks 1
Estimated Total Number of Voters 96
Estimated Percent of YES* 84.38%

GRANGE TWP.
Yes 100
No 16
Estimated Blanks 0
Estimated Total Number of Voters 116
Estimated Percent of YES* 86.21%

GRAY TWP.
Yes 90
No 25
Estimated Blanks 1
Estimated Total Number of Voters 116
Estimated Percent of YES* 77.59%

HATFIELD
Yes 13
No 7
Estimated Blanks 0
Estimated Total Number of Voters 20
Estimated Percent of YES* 65.00%

HOLLAND
Yes 64
No 19
Estimated Blanks 1
Estimated Total Number of Voters 84
Estimated Percent of YES* 76.19%

IHLEN
Yes 29
No 6
Estimated Blanks 1
Estimated Total Number of Voters 36
Estimated Percent of YES* 80.56%

JASPER
Yes 174
No 64
Estimated Blanks 3
Estimated Total Number of Voters 241
Estimated Percent of YES* 72.20%

OSBORNE TWP.
Yes 177
No 12
Estimated Blanks 0
Estimated Total Number of Voters 189
Estimated Percent of YES* 93.65%

PIPESTONE PRECINCT 1
Yes 553
No 281
Estimated Blanks 10
Estimated Total Number of Voters 844
Estimated Percent of YES* 65.52%

PIPESTONE PRECINCT 2
Yes 682
No 333
Estimated Blanks 16
Estimated Total Number of Voters 1,031
Estimated Percent of YES* 66.15%

ROCK TWP.
Yes 64
No 10
Estimated Blanks 1
Estimated Total Number of Voters 75
Estimated Percent of YES* 85.33%

RUTHTON
Yes 66
No 40
Estimated Blanks 0
Estimated Total Number of Voters 106
Estimated Percent of YES* 62.26%

SWEET TWP.
Yes 150
No 30
Estimated Blanks 0
Estimated Total Number of Voters 180
Estimated Percent of YES* 83.33%

TROSKY
Yes 39
No 12
Estimated Blanks 1
Estimated Total Number of Voters 52
Estimated Percent of YES* 75.00%

TROY TWP.
Yes 121
No 34
Estimated Blanks 0
Estimated Total Number of Voters 155
Estimated Percent of YES* 78.06%

WOODSTOCK
Yes 35
No 11
Estimated Blanks 3
Estimated Total Number of Voters 49
Estimated Percent of YES* 71.43%