Unofficial Results Tuesday, November 6, 2012
Precincts Reporting in State: 100% 48 of 48
Last Updated: 12/07/12 11:46 AM
Voters Registered at 7AM: 17,998
Results for Constitutional Amendments
Passage of a Constitutional Amendment depends on the total number of voters casting ballots in the election. On this site, the total number voting is estimated using the votes cast for U.S. President, and is replaced by the actual number who voted as voting statistics are entered for each precinct.Value | Definition |
---|---|
Estimated Total Number of Voters | Calculated using votes for U.S. President & Vice President or actual statistics. |
Yes | Actual YES votes cast |
No | Actual NO votes cast |
Estimated Blanks | Equals Estimated Total Number of Voters minus Yes votes and No votes |
Estimated Percent of YES* | YES divided by Estimated Total Number of Voters, displayed as a percentage |
*An estimated YES percentage of greater than 50% is an indication of likely passage of an amendment. |
Results by Precinct for Morrison County |
|
Constitutional Amendment 1 Show Question | |
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT 1 RECOGNITION OF MARRIAGE SOLELY BETWEEN ONE MAN AND ONE WOMAN | |
AGRAM TOWNSHIP | |
Yes | 214 |
No | 79 |
Estimated Blanks | 3 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 296 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 72.30% |
BELLE PRAIRIE TOWNSHIP | |
Yes | 477 |
No | 206 |
Estimated Blanks | 9 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 692 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 68.93% |
BELLEVUE TOWNSHIP | |
Yes | 429 |
No | 154 |
Estimated Blanks | 5 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 588 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 72.96% |
BOWLUS | |
Yes | 97 |
No | 28 |
Estimated Blanks | 0 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 125 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 77.60% |
BUCKMAN | |
Yes | 88 |
No | 16 |
Estimated Blanks | 1 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 105 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 83.81% |
BUCKMAN TOWNSHIP | |
Yes | 235 |
No | 60 |
Estimated Blanks | 3 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 298 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 78.86% |
BUH TOWNSHIP | |
Yes | 204 |
No | 64 |
Estimated Blanks | 1 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 269 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 75.84% |
CULDRUM TOWNSHIP | |
Yes | 180 |
No | 40 |
Estimated Blanks | 2 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 222 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 81.08% |
CUSHING TOWNSHIP | |
Yes | 250 |
No | 131 |
Estimated Blanks | 4 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 385 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 64.94% |
DARLING TOWNSHIP | |
Yes | 238 |
No | 76 |
Estimated Blanks | 4 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 318 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 74.84% |
ELMDALE | |
Yes | 48 |
No | 11 |
Estimated Blanks | 1 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 60 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 80.00% |
ELMDALE TOWNSHIP | |
Yes | 441 |
No | 87 |
Estimated Blanks | 4 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 532 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 82.89% |
FLENSBURG | |
Yes | 89 |
No | 28 |
Estimated Blanks | 2 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 119 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 74.79% |
GENOLA | |
Yes | 23 |
No | 3 |
Estimated Blanks | 0 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 26 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 88.46% |
GRANITE TOWNSHIP | |
Yes | 176 |
No | 61 |
Estimated Blanks | 2 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 239 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 73.64% |
GREEN PRAIRIE TOWNSHIP | |
Yes | 275 |
No | 125 |
Estimated Blanks | 6 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 406 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 67.73% |
HARDING | |
Yes | 35 |
No | 8 |
Estimated Blanks | 0 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 43 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 81.40% |
HILLMAN | |
Yes | 8 |
No | 12 |
Estimated Blanks | 1 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 21 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 38.10% |
HILLMAN TOWNSHIP | |
Yes | 60 |
No | 26 |
Estimated Blanks | 1 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 87 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 68.97% |
LAKIN TOWNSHIP | |
Yes | 148 |
No | 62 |
Estimated Blanks | 4 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 214 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 69.16% |
LASTRUP | |
Yes | 32 |
No | 21 |
Estimated Blanks | 0 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 53 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 60.38% |
LEIGH TOWNSHIP | |
Yes | 73 |
No | 22 |
Estimated Blanks | 0 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 95 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 76.84% |
LITTLE FALLS TOWNSHIP | |
Yes | 638 |
No | 334 |
Estimated Blanks | 11 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 983 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 64.90% |
LITTLE FALLS W-1 | |
Yes | 745 |
No | 548 |
Estimated Blanks | 20 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 1,313 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 56.74% |
LITTLE FALLS W-2 | |
Yes | 838 |
No | 633 |
Estimated Blanks | 20 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 1,491 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 56.20% |
LITTLE FALLS W-3 | |
Yes | 675 |
No | 423 |
Estimated Blanks | 7 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 1,105 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 61.09% |
MORRILL TOWNSHIP | |
Yes | 208 |
No | 74 |
Estimated Blanks | 6 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 288 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 72.22% |
MOTLEY | |
Yes | 167 |
No | 93 |
Estimated Blanks | 2 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 262 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 63.74% |
MOTLEY TOWNSHIP | |
Yes | 85 |
No | 47 |
Estimated Blanks | 0 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 132 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 64.39% |
MOUNT MORRIS TOWNSHIP | |
Yes | 40 |
No | 10 |
Estimated Blanks | 0 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 50 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 80.00% |
PARKER TOWNSHIP | |
Yes | 160 |
No | 85 |
Estimated Blanks | 4 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 249 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 64.26% |
PIERZ | |
Yes | 429 |
No | 196 |
Estimated Blanks | 4 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 629 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 68.20% |
PIERZ TOWNSHIP | |
Yes | 170 |
No | 47 |
Estimated Blanks | 1 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 218 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 77.98% |
PIKE CREEK TOWNSHIP | |
Yes | 394 |
No | 154 |
Estimated Blanks | 6 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 554 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 71.12% |
PLATTE TOWNSHIP | |
Yes | 116 |
No | 43 |
Estimated Blanks | 3 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 162 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 71.60% |
PULASKI TOWNSHIP | |
Yes | 113 |
No | 37 |
Estimated Blanks | 2 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 152 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 74.34% |
RANDALL | |
Yes | 193 |
No | 107 |
Estimated Blanks | 2 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 302 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 63.91% |
RICHARDSON TOWNSHIP | |
Yes | 204 |
No | 76 |
Estimated Blanks | 3 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 283 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 72.08% |
RIPLEY TOWNSHIP | |
Yes | 283 |
No | 122 |
Estimated Blanks | 6 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 411 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 68.86% |
ROSING TOWNSHIP | |
Yes | 71 |
No | 29 |
Estimated Blanks | 0 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 100 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 71.00% |
ROYALTON | |
Yes | 316 |
No | 237 |
Estimated Blanks | 5 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 558 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 56.63% |
SCANDIA VALLEY TOWNSHIP | |
Yes | 571 |
No | 252 |
Estimated Blanks | 10 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 833 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 68.55% |
SOBIESKI | |
Yes | 66 |
No | 22 |
Estimated Blanks | 3 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 91 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 72.53% |
SWAN RIVER TOWNSHIP | |
Yes | 298 |
No | 100 |
Estimated Blanks | 5 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 403 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 73.95% |
SWANVILLE | |
Yes | 98 |
No | 52 |
Estimated Blanks | 0 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 150 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 65.33% |
SWANVILLE TOWNSHIP | |
Yes | 239 |
No | 36 |
Estimated Blanks | 5 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 280 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 85.36% |
TWO RIVERS TOWNSHIP | |
Yes | 328 |
No | 96 |
Estimated Blanks | 5 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 429 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 76.46% |
UPSALA | |
Yes | 159 |
No | 55 |
Estimated Blanks | 2 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 216 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 73.61% |