Unofficial Results Tuesday, November 6, 2012
Precincts Reporting in State: 100% 32 of 32
Last Updated: 12/07/12 11:46 AM
Voters Registered at 7AM: 3,517
Results for Constitutional Amendments
Passage of a Constitutional Amendment depends on the total number of voters casting ballots in the election. On this site, the total number voting is estimated using the votes cast for U.S. President, and is replaced by the actual number who voted as voting statistics are entered for each precinct.| Value | Definition |
|---|---|
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | Calculated using votes for U.S. President & Vice President or actual statistics. |
| Yes | Actual YES votes cast |
| No | Actual NO votes cast |
| Estimated Blanks | Equals Estimated Total Number of Voters minus Yes votes and No votes |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | YES divided by Estimated Total Number of Voters, displayed as a percentage |
| *An estimated YES percentage of greater than 50% is an indication of likely passage of an amendment. | |
Results by Municipality for Wilkin County |
|
| Constitutional Amendment 2 Show Question | |
| CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT 2 PHOTO IDENTIFICATION REQUIRED FOR VOTING | |
| Akron Twp | |
| Yes | 58 |
| No | 27 |
| Estimated Blanks | 1 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 86 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 67.44% |
| Andrea Twp | |
| Yes | 14 |
| No | 16 |
| Estimated Blanks | 1 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 31 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 45.16% |
| Atherton Twp | |
| Yes | 41 |
| No | 30 |
| Estimated Blanks | 1 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 72 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 56.94% |
| Bradford Twp | |
| Yes | 29 |
| No | 13 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 42 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 69.05% |
| Brandrup Twp | |
| Yes | 63 |
| No | 23 |
| Estimated Blanks | 1 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 87 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 72.41% |
| Breckenridge | |
| Yes | 884 |
| No | 598 |
| Estimated Blanks | 40 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 1,522 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 58.08% |
| Breckenridge Twp | |
| Yes | 73 |
| No | 51 |
| Estimated Blanks | 3 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 127 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 57.48% |
| Campbell | |
| Yes | 51 |
| No | 42 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 93 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 54.84% |
| Campbell Twp | |
| Yes | 20 |
| No | 12 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 32 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 62.50% |
| Champion Twp | |
| Yes | 21 |
| No | 15 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 36 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 58.33% |
| Connelly Twp | |
| Yes | 35 |
| No | 27 |
| Estimated Blanks | 2 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 64 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 54.69% |
| Deerhorn Twp | |
| Yes | 23 |
| No | 29 |
| Estimated Blanks | 1 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 53 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 43.40% |
| Doran | |
| Yes | 8 |
| No | 12 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 20 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 40.00% |
| Foxhome | |
| Yes | 39 |
| No | 31 |
| Estimated Blanks | 4 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 74 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 52.70% |
| Foxhome Twp | |
| Yes | 32 |
| No | 30 |
| Estimated Blanks | 2 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 64 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 50.00% |
| Kent | |
| Yes | 26 |
| No | 14 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 40 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 65.00% |
| Manston Twp | |
| Yes | 17 |
| No | 12 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 29 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 58.62% |
| Mccauleyville Twp | |
| Yes | 20 |
| No | 12 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 32 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 62.50% |
| Meadows Twp | |
| Yes | 13 |
| No | 15 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 28 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 46.43% |
| Mitchell Twp | |
| Yes | 24 |
| No | 21 |
| Estimated Blanks | 2 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 47 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 51.06% |
| Nashua | |
| Yes | 9 |
| No | 11 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 20 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 45.00% |
| Nilsen Twp | |
| Yes | 26 |
| No | 10 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 36 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 72.22% |
| Nordick Twp | |
| Yes | 27 |
| No | 23 |
| Estimated Blanks | 3 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 53 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 50.94% |
| Prairie View Twp | |
| Yes | 61 |
| No | 35 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 96 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 63.54% |
| Roberts Twp | |
| Yes | 28 |
| No | 19 |
| Estimated Blanks | 1 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 48 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 58.33% |
| Rothsay | |
| Yes | 134 |
| No | 95 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 147 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 58.26% |
| Sunnyside Twp | |
| Yes | 44 |
| No | 34 |
| Estimated Blanks | 1 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 79 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 55.70% |
| Tanberg Twp | |
| Yes | 23 |
| No | 18 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 41 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 56.10% |
| Wolverton | |
| Yes | 53 |
| No | 23 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 76 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 69.74% |
| Wolverton Twp | |
| Yes | 38 |
| No | 27 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 65 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 58.46% |