Unofficial Results Tuesday, November 6, 2012
Precincts Reporting in State: 100% 22 of 22
Last Updated: 12/07/12 11:46 AM
Voters Registered at 7AM: 5,071
Results for Constitutional Amendments
Passage of a Constitutional Amendment depends on the total number of voters casting ballots in the election. On this site, the total number voting is estimated using the votes cast for U.S. President, and is replaced by the actual number who voted as voting statistics are entered for each precinct.Value | Definition |
---|---|
Estimated Total Number of Voters | Calculated using votes for U.S. President & Vice President or actual statistics. |
Yes | Actual YES votes cast |
No | Actual NO votes cast |
Estimated Blanks | Equals Estimated Total Number of Voters minus Yes votes and No votes |
Estimated Percent of YES* | YES divided by Estimated Total Number of Voters, displayed as a percentage |
*An estimated YES percentage of greater than 50% is an indication of likely passage of an amendment. |
Results by Municipality for Pipestone County |
|
Constitutional Amendment 1 Show Question | |
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT 1 RECOGNITION OF MARRIAGE SOLELY BETWEEN ONE MAN AND ONE WOMAN | |
Aetna Twp | |
Yes | 96 |
No | 24 |
Estimated Blanks | 0 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 120 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 80.00% |
Altona Twp | |
Yes | 54 |
No | 18 |
Estimated Blanks | 0 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 72 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 75.00% |
Burke Twp | |
Yes | 109 |
No | 11 |
Estimated Blanks | 1 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 121 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 90.08% |
Eden Twp | |
Yes | 114 |
No | 29 |
Estimated Blanks | 2 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 145 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 78.62% |
Edgerton | |
Yes | 622 |
No | 80 |
Estimated Blanks | 8 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 710 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 87.61% |
Elmer Twp | |
Yes | 106 |
No | 16 |
Estimated Blanks | 2 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 124 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 85.48% |
Fountain Prairie Twp | |
Yes | 81 |
No | 14 |
Estimated Blanks | 1 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 96 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 84.38% |
Grange Twp | |
Yes | 100 |
No | 16 |
Estimated Blanks | 0 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 116 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 86.21% |
Gray Twp | |
Yes | 90 |
No | 25 |
Estimated Blanks | 1 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 116 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 77.59% |
Hatfield | |
Yes | 13 |
No | 7 |
Estimated Blanks | 0 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 20 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 65.00% |
Holland | |
Yes | 64 |
No | 19 |
Estimated Blanks | 1 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 84 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 76.19% |
Ihlen | |
Yes | 29 |
No | 6 |
Estimated Blanks | 1 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 36 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 80.56% |
Jasper | |
Yes | 190 |
No | 73 |
Estimated Blanks | 0 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 241 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 71.16% |
Osborne Twp | |
Yes | 177 |
No | 12 |
Estimated Blanks | 0 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 189 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 93.65% |
Pipestone | |
Yes | 1,235 |
No | 614 |
Estimated Blanks | 26 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 1,875 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 65.87% |
Rock Twp | |
Yes | 64 |
No | 10 |
Estimated Blanks | 1 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 75 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 85.33% |
Ruthton | |
Yes | 66 |
No | 40 |
Estimated Blanks | 0 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 106 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 62.26% |
Sweet Twp | |
Yes | 150 |
No | 30 |
Estimated Blanks | 0 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 180 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 83.33% |
Trosky | |
Yes | 39 |
No | 12 |
Estimated Blanks | 1 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 52 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 75.00% |
Troy Twp | |
Yes | 121 |
No | 34 |
Estimated Blanks | 0 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 155 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 78.06% |
Woodstock | |
Yes | 35 |
No | 11 |
Estimated Blanks | 3 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 49 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 71.43% |