Unofficial Results Tuesday, November 6, 2012
Precincts Reporting in State: 100% 37 of 37
Last Updated: 12/07/12 11:46 AM
Voters Registered at 7AM: 12,120
Results for Constitutional Amendments
Passage of a Constitutional Amendment depends on the total number of voters casting ballots in the election. On this site, the total number voting is estimated using the votes cast for U.S. President, and is replaced by the actual number who voted as voting statistics are entered for each precinct.| Value | Definition |
|---|---|
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | Calculated using votes for U.S. President & Vice President or actual statistics. |
| Yes | Actual YES votes cast |
| No | Actual NO votes cast |
| Estimated Blanks | Equals Estimated Total Number of Voters minus Yes votes and No votes |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | YES divided by Estimated Total Number of Voters, displayed as a percentage |
| *An estimated YES percentage of greater than 50% is an indication of likely passage of an amendment. | |
Results by Municipality for Martin County |
|
| Constitutional Amendment 1 Show Question | |
| CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT 1 RECOGNITION OF MARRIAGE SOLELY BETWEEN ONE MAN AND ONE WOMAN | |
| Cedar Twp | |
| Yes | 106 |
| No | 26 |
| Estimated Blanks | 1 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 133 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 79.70% |
| Center Creek Twp | |
| Yes | 103 |
| No | 33 |
| Estimated Blanks | 1 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 137 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 75.18% |
| Ceylon | |
| Yes | 101 |
| No | 57 |
| Estimated Blanks | 2 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 160 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 63.13% |
| Dunnell | |
| Yes | 60 |
| No | 30 |
| Estimated Blanks | 2 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 92 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 65.22% |
| East Chain Twp | |
| Yes | 145 |
| No | 25 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 170 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 85.29% |
| Elm Creek Twp | |
| Yes | 78 |
| No | 38 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 116 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 67.24% |
| Fairmont | |
| Yes | 3,480 |
| No | 1,842 |
| Estimated Blanks | 59 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 5,381 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 64.67% |
| Fairmont Twp | |
| Yes | 128 |
| No | 51 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 179 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 71.51% |
| Fox Lake Twp | |
| Yes | 117 |
| No | 52 |
| Estimated Blanks | 5 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 174 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 67.24% |
| Fraser Twp | |
| Yes | 110 |
| No | 36 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 146 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 75.34% |
| Galena Twp | |
| Yes | 98 |
| No | 39 |
| Estimated Blanks | 1 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 138 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 71.01% |
| Granada | |
| Yes | 104 |
| No | 43 |
| Estimated Blanks | 1 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 148 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 70.27% |
| Jay Twp | |
| Yes | 96 |
| No | 40 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 136 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 70.59% |
| Lake Belt Twp | |
| Yes | 94 |
| No | 39 |
| Estimated Blanks | 1 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 134 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 70.15% |
| Lake Fremont Twp | |
| Yes | 67 |
| No | 28 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 95 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 70.53% |
| Manyaska Twp | |
| Yes | 131 |
| No | 65 |
| Estimated Blanks | 1 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 197 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 66.50% |
| Nashville Twp | |
| Yes | 90 |
| No | 34 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 124 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 72.58% |
| Northrop | |
| Yes | 94 |
| No | 41 |
| Estimated Blanks | 3 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 138 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 68.12% |
| Ormsby | |
| Yes | 49 |
| No | 20 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 28 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 71.01% |
| Pleasant Prairie Twp | |
| Yes | 93 |
| No | 36 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 129 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 72.09% |
| Rolling Green Twp | |
| Yes | 101 |
| No | 44 |
| Estimated Blanks | 4 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 149 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 67.79% |
| Rutland Twp | |
| Yes | 185 |
| No | 71 |
| Estimated Blanks | 2 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 258 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 71.71% |
| Sherburn | |
| Yes | 374 |
| No | 178 |
| Estimated Blanks | 8 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 560 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 66.79% |
| Silver Lake Twp | |
| Yes | 250 |
| No | 83 |
| Estimated Blanks | 5 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 338 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 73.96% |
| Tenhassen Twp | |
| Yes | 125 |
| No | 22 |
| Estimated Blanks | 1 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 148 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 84.46% |
| Trimont | |
| Yes | 253 |
| No | 122 |
| Estimated Blanks | 4 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 379 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 66.75% |
| Truman | |
| Yes | 394 |
| No | 177 |
| Estimated Blanks | 5 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 576 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 68.40% |
| Waverly Twp | |
| Yes | 84 |
| No | 45 |
| Estimated Blanks | 0 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 129 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 65.12% |
| Welcome | |
| Yes | 239 |
| No | 129 |
| Estimated Blanks | 1 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 369 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 64.77% |
| Westford Twp | |
| Yes | 146 |
| No | 31 |
| Estimated Blanks | 1 |
| Estimated Total Number of Voters | 178 |
| Estimated Percent of YES* | 82.02% |