Unofficial Results Tuesday, November 6, 2012
Precincts Reporting in State: 100% 20 of 20
Last Updated: 12/07/12 11:46 AM
Voters Registered at 7AM: 3,395
Results for Constitutional Amendments
Passage of a Constitutional Amendment depends on the total number of voters casting ballots in the election. On this site, the total number voting is estimated using the votes cast for U.S. President, and is replaced by the actual number who voted as voting statistics are entered for each precinct.Value | Definition |
---|---|
Estimated Total Number of Voters | Calculated using votes for U.S. President & Vice President or actual statistics. |
Yes | Actual YES votes cast |
No | Actual NO votes cast |
Estimated Blanks | Equals Estimated Total Number of Voters minus Yes votes and No votes |
Estimated Percent of YES* | YES divided by Estimated Total Number of Voters, displayed as a percentage |
*An estimated YES percentage of greater than 50% is an indication of likely passage of an amendment. |
Results by Municipality for Lincoln County |
|
Constitutional Amendment 1 Show Question | |
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT 1 RECOGNITION OF MARRIAGE SOLELY BETWEEN ONE MAN AND ONE WOMAN | |
Alta Vista Twp | |
Yes | 76 |
No | 33 |
Estimated Blanks | 2 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 111 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 68.47% |
Arco | |
Yes | 22 |
No | 18 |
Estimated Blanks | 2 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 42 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 52.38% |
Ash Lake Twp | |
Yes | 82 |
No | 16 |
Estimated Blanks | 2 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 100 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 82.00% |
Diamond Lake Twp | |
Yes | 73 |
No | 22 |
Estimated Blanks | 2 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 97 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 75.26% |
Drammen Twp | |
Yes | 44 |
No | 9 |
Estimated Blanks | 0 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 53 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 83.02% |
Hansonville Twp | |
Yes | 41 |
No | 13 |
Estimated Blanks | 0 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 54 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 75.93% |
Hendricks | |
Yes | 236 |
No | 107 |
Estimated Blanks | 8 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 351 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 67.24% |
Hendricks Twp | |
Yes | 89 |
No | 25 |
Estimated Blanks | 5 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 119 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 74.79% |
Hope Twp | |
Yes | 101 |
No | 47 |
Estimated Blanks | 0 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 148 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 68.24% |
Ivanhoe | |
Yes | 218 |
No | 118 |
Estimated Blanks | 8 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 344 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 63.37% |
Lake Benton | |
Yes | 257 |
No | 87 |
Estimated Blanks | 3 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 347 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 74.06% |
Lake Benton Twp | |
Yes | 94 |
No | 18 |
Estimated Blanks | 4 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 116 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 81.03% |
Lake Stay Twp | |
Yes | 57 |
No | 17 |
Estimated Blanks | 3 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 77 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 74.03% |
Limestone Twp | |
Yes | 57 |
No | 20 |
Estimated Blanks | 2 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 79 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 72.15% |
Marble Twp | |
Yes | 51 |
No | 32 |
Estimated Blanks | 1 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 84 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 60.71% |
Marshfield Twp | |
Yes | 85 |
No | 34 |
Estimated Blanks | 0 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 119 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 71.43% |
Royal Twp | |
Yes | 81 |
No | 22 |
Estimated Blanks | 3 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 106 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 76.42% |
Shaokatan Twp | |
Yes | 84 |
No | 31 |
Estimated Blanks | 3 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 118 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 71.19% |
Tyler | |
Yes | 409 |
No | 196 |
Estimated Blanks | 10 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 615 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 66.50% |
Verdi Twp | |
Yes | 54 |
No | 14 |
Estimated Blanks | 0 |
Estimated Total Number of Voters | 68 |
Estimated Percent of YES* | 79.41% |